
, somone I
USED to look up to in terms of Ginga-style drawing, has now turned out to be the biggest bitch I've ever met.
She
'MADE' this species called the 'Gallytrotter', but it's a complete and total ripoff from the Black Shucks of old 'lore back in England. And now she has her 'Gallytrotters' and is saying that they're 'copyrighted to her because all copyrights made before -insert date after Black Shucks were seen- are invalid, and do not therefore count'.
THAT'S A LOAD OF BULLSHIT!Stealing an old legend and making it 'yours' is just downright discusting! We can't copyright dragons, and they were around probably longer than the Shucks! Sure, we can make our own species, but dragons in itself are never truely ours. So why can she make 'Gallytrotters' hers? She said they were 'formally known as Shucks', and that's the same as stealing the legend and making it hers because she feels like it.
I can't just go and say 'Dinosaurs are (c) to me because they were here far before copyrights' Because I never made them! So why does she think in her mind that it's ok?
STAND UP FOR THE BLACK SHUCK! I know the truth, as do the people who have heard the legend in england.
(you can write any personal note for Avyris here)
Now Avyris, I'd be happy if this were used as an guideline for the Black Shucks, BUT if you want to make your own breed of ghostdog, BE FUCKING ORIGINAL. Don't go stealing some old legend, changing it's name, and calling it yours!If you agree that *Avyris should renounce this so-called 'copyright', post this in your journal. It is unfair to the Black Shucks, and all the rest who know the truth!